A push for reproducibility in biomedical research
Controversial software is proving surprisingly accurate at spotting errors in psychology papers
We need a similar program for #pathology articles. Though most pathology articles do not report #statistics in APA style. #statcheck
Stat-checking software stirs up psychology
“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False” by John P. A. Ioannidis
“Public Availability of Published Research Data in High-Impact Journals” by Alawi A. Alsheikh-Ali , Waqas Qureshi, Mouaz H. Al-Mallah, John P. A. Ioannidis.
“Gene name errors are widespread in the scientific literature” by Mark Ziemann, Yotam Eren, and Assam El-Osta.
“Deriving chemosensitivity from cell lines: Forensic bioinformatics and reproducible research in high-throughput biology” by Keith A. Baggerly and Kevin R. Coombes.
by Thomas Herndon, Michael Ash, Robert Pollin.
An example of an article given the highest designation for a fully reproducible article:
published in 2009 by Duncan Lee, Claire Ferguson, and Richard Mitchell. To see the article's marking, download the PDF and look for the marking letter in a bold box at the top right.
by Geir Kjetil Sandve, Anton Nekrutenko, James Taylor, Eivind Hovig.
“Open-Source Genomic Analysis of Shiga-Toxin–Producing E. coli O104:H4” (multiple authors). The associated Dataset GigaScience and GitHub Wiki .
A universal document converter